Anti-doping officers must not violate constitutional rights of athletes

Legislators of California confirm that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of athletes suspected of doping. Thus, sportspersons that have never tested positive for any forbidden preparations are pursued. That’s why the lawmakers asked Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored chiefly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars each year. This governmental office induces fighting against application of forbidden medicines. Its goal is to eradicate illegal manufacture and drug use, crimes resulted from administration of illegal drugs, etc.
The request of California lawmakers was initiated soon after the cyclist Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime suspension from professional sports.
Everyone knows that the celebrated cyclist Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his 7 titles acquired at Tour de France. He was also suspended from competitions entirely.
In June Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, claiming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks didn’t desire to accept the lawsuit. He claimed that the USADA acted appropriately. Sam Sparks also noticed that the USADA was formed in order to clean sports from sportspeople who administer banned medications.
California Senator Michael Rubio confirmed that Sam Sparks didn’t do correctly, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. So, the senators claimed that the USADA violated rights of several athletes. That’s why they presented the request before Congress.

Barry Bonds can support Lance Armstrong

Barry Bonds knows what an athlete experiences, when he/she is targeted by feds and anti-doping officials. He understands what this individual feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspeople accused of doping. So, Barry Bonds supports the former American cyclist Lance Armstrong.
During an interview a journalist asked Barry Bonds about troubles of Lance Armstrong related to doping suspicions. The former baseball player expressed his admiration towards the cyclist. He confirmed that Lance Armstrong was the most excellent cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Of course, Barry Bonds realizes what he says. He realizes what it means to be a good cyclist. After this person retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He participated in certain competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, Barry Bonds sees that this sport has the same problems like baseball. He understands that cyclists are pursued by the government and anti-doping officers like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were prosecuted by federal prosecutors and anti-doping officers.
Feds accused Barry Bonds of lying about application of forbidden substances and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the athlete lied about intake of banned substances. But feds found him guilty of obstructing justice. The former baseball player decided to appeal the decision of the court.
As for Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to target the cyclist. The USADA confirmed that Lance Armstrong had been applying forbidden substances throughout his cycling career. The cyclist decided to stop fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He was stripped of his Tour de France titles and money he had received at these events.
However Lance Armstrong lost his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They affirm that he is the most wonderful cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors continue to support his cancer charity. The seven-time Tour de France winner helps people to fight against cancer. Thus, many persons are thankful. They will always remember what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been spoiled by accusations connected with usage of banned substances. The former baseball player hopes that his achievements during the baseball career are more significant than the accusations. He believes that people will forget about the accusations and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Why did Nadezya Ostapchuk fail drug test?

The Belarusian shot putter Nadezya Ostapchuk received the gold medal at the 2012 Summer Olympics. But she failed a drug test. As a result, she forfeited the medal which was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests displayed that a steroid’s metabolites presented in her urine samples.
If a sportsperson is caught using any prohibited substances, he/she is commonly sentenced to a suspension of two years. As for this Belarusian shot putter, she received one-year suspension. Why was the sentence lighter? There were certain circumstances that proved the following condition: the Belarusian shot putter didn’t administer any forbidden medicine intentionally.
At the beginning the Belarusian shot putter blamed his former coach. She affirmed that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency investigated this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation assisted the investigation. It was defined that Yefimov was guilty. This person put powder of methenolone into food of the Belarusian shot putter during the last week before the Olympics. The coach reported that he had worried about the shot putter. He believed that this steroid would help to win.
In fact, it is difficult to comprehend why Yefimov has done it. He only caused the problem.
Anti-doping officers accepted these statements. That’s why Nadezya Ostapchuk received just one-year suspension.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that Nadezya Ostapchuk had not taken the steroid intentionally. They claimed that Yefimov just tried to protect the athlete. They confirmed that the Belarusian shot putter had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If the Belarusian shot putter’s performance was great certain months before the 2012 Olympics, her trainer had to be sure that she would win. Why did he trouble about?

Feds are interested in sexual performance of athletes that are suspected of steroid use

Some athletes who are suspected of steroid use become targets of the government. Feds do almost everything in order to determine whether several athletes have administered any doping products. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this goal. Much money is spent to reveal even private life of sportspeople. According to the government, several details of their private behavior can reveal the truth about usage of banned substances. Thus, girlfriends of some athletes are interviewed by feds.
For example, it has been reported that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about several details connected with private life of these sportspersons. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about size of testicles of this athlete. She affirmed that the baseball player’s testicles were shrunken. So, her answer served as a proof that Barry Bonds took steroids and/or other forbidden medicines.
It is known that shrinkage of testicles is included in adverse results of several steroids. Thus, the government decided to learn whether Barry Bonds had had this trouble. But it is an unreliable argument in order to prove that anyone has taken some prohibited products. Steroid users may prevent this side effect, if they take some medications for this purpose.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former athlete had suffered from erectile dysfunctions. The woman confirmed that sometimes Roger Clemens had experienced this problem.
When it comes to erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during intake of steroids. But if you study information about side effects of steroids more attentively, you can understand that this effect is more likely to appear after discontinuation of application. It happens because natural secretion of testosterone is normally suppressed by intake of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such remedies which are capable to regenerate natural testosterone production, erectile dysfunctions can be avoided.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also interviewed by the government. But questions are not disclosed. According to several suppositions, she might have been asked also about sexuality of the 7-time Tour de France winner.
In fact, the government has a wrong point of view in this case. Although testicular atrophy and erectile dysfunctions may appear because of steroids, these arguments are not proper.

Don Hooton realizes that it is not easy to teach youth about risks linked with steroids

Some preparations are named “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these medicines represent? Why have been they called “performance-enhancing”? Various people may have different definitions. Let mention what a teenager believes! Before presenting her point of view it is important to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, experienced serious depression after intake of steroids. Finally, he committed suicide. He wanted to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other prominent sportspersons who have applied steroids. But his death came suddenly. His sister notes that performance-enhancing drugs are unsafe medicines. They are named “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young individuals that desire to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, formed a foundation to teach youth about risks connected with steroids. He describes which dangers are associated with application of anabolic steroids and other related medications. He also uses slideshow presentations in order to explain that these medications can lead to such side effects, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver dysfunctions, etc.
Don Hooton tries to teach young people about serious risks related to intake of steroids. But he admits that it is not easy. He affirms that numerous young individuals administer doping products. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they desire to look like them. They follow their examples in order to improve appearance and have more strength.
Unfortunately, certain parents believe that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them believe that their daughters don’t administer steroids because these medicines are indicated to gain muscles and body weight in general. But according to certain sources, girls also use steroids. They use these products in order to lose fat. Several parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also taken to reduce fat deposits. That’s why adults also should be taught about effects of steroids. Furthermore, several parents think that their children don’t take steroids because these medicines are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to buy steroids for a cycle.
It is affirmed that every16th high school student takes steroids. But this opinion is mistaken. Every 16th high school student admits to using performance-enhancing drugs.   But numerous young individuals hide that they use these preparations.
Those that listen to Don Hooton’s presentations about steroids express their thanks. They are happy that they get knowledge about these products.

Hypocritical fight against usage of performance-enhancing drugs

Anyone knows that anabolic steroids are frequently blamed. If an athlete or a bodybuilder uses steroids and/or other doping products, he/she is called a cheater. Sportswriters report about such sportspersons as about those who have spoiled their reputation. Anti-doping officials put great efforts and spend money in other to catch athletes that dope. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that some sportspersons have taken steroids and/or doping products. It is claimed that those who dope take unfair advantages in sports.
Numerous articles describe the war on steroids. But let see whether arguments against application of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to administer them.
It is affirmed that steroid-using sportspersons serve as a bad example for kids and young individuals. It is known that youth sees numerous sports stars that use steroids and other related remedies. As a result, young people desire to look and be as strong, as these famous sports figures.  Furthermore, it is widely disputed about health risks connected with steroids. But if you are attentive, you can notice that these arguments are weak because hypocrisy reigns here.
Let examine the most frequently used arguments against usage of anabolic steroids and/or other related medications.
According to the first argument, usage of steroids is closely associated with certain possible health risks. Numerous articles warn about testicular atrophy and enlargement of heart which may occur on account of steroid use. However it may be true, let analyze our life. We eat unhealthy food, although we know that it destroys our health. Some individuals take antidepressants that are also very unsafe. We are also involved in other unhealthy activities.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using sportspersons have unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they improve performance with these drugs. Let see what happens in other areas, for example, in the world of entertainment.  Numerous actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play several roles in movies. They also have unfair advantages over others with the help of several surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to suspensions.
While it is affirmed that steroid-using sportspeople send bad messages to young individuals that want to look like them and follow their examples, nobody mentions about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also want to look like those they see in magazines.
While feds pursue sportspersons that take steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses that act like steroid-using athletes.
It is clear that arguments against intake of steroids are quite weak. They display hypocrisy that reigns in our counterfeit world.

Belarusian shot putter lost her Olympic gold medal for usage of metenolone

Nadzeya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, won the gold medal at the 2012 Olympic Games. But she was stripped of the medal because she tested positive for the steroid metenolone (methenolone). She was asked to provide two samples. The substance metenolone presented in both urine samples.
If you read steroid scandals, you must know that professional sportspersons and bodybuilders are usually caught applying other steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. But as for Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she tested positive for metenolone. It is strange, according to statements of anti-doping officers. What does this forbidden medication represent? Why don’t sportspersons ordinarily take this preparation for enhancement of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It possesses weak androgenic features. It works like testosterone, enhancing muscle mass and adding strength.
Although this drug has only weak androgenic nature, it causes development of sex male features in women. Females that apply this remedy may face typical effects of virilization: the voice becomes deeper; excessive hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This product may be taken orally or through injections.
Metenolone (Methenolone) causes amazing effects, when it is used by sportspersons during their trainings. It is not taken during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is applied only on the day of a competition.
It is also affirmed that it is easy to catch those that administer this anabolic steroid.
Adverse results of Metenolone (Methenolone) depend on doses which are used. They are following: fluid retention, hypercalcaemia, bone growth, excessive hair growth on the body, acne, hair loss, menstrual problems, increased sex drive, etc.
Thus, if you see a female athlete who has deep voice and hirsutism, you may suspect her of steroid use. Actually, it is wrong because these problems may occur also in those females that don’t administer any steroids. But sometimes these effects demonstrate that certain female athletes use preparations which have androgenic nature.

Steroid prescriptions provided by Australian doctor

Certain doctors abuse their position, prescribing products that don’t meet criteria of medical needs of patients. Why does it happen? It is known that certain medications are considered to be prescription preparations. It means that you can’t purchase them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such drugs. It is illegal to buy steroids without a prescription in several countries. Those who do it may be punished. They may be enforced to pay a fine and/or go to prison. Of course, a lot of individuals seek ways to get and administer these medications without having legal troubles.
Anabolic steroids are often abused. Many sportspersons and bodybuilders administer these products not for clinical purposes but for enhancement of performance. If they live in countries where these medications can’t be bought legally without prescriptions, they find some ways to mask their illicit purchase and application. Athletes, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their physicians to prescribe them these medicines, as if they had clinical needs to administer them. Thus, certain physicians induce selling anabolic steroids to those that abuse them. Here is a situation.
Peter Grant, an Australian health care provider, recommended steroids to 14 patients during 9 years. Medical state of these persons didn’t require administration of these medications. So, the health care provider was accused of improper practicing medicine. For example, he recommended to a patient applying such drugs, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to recommend these medications to this individual. Furthermore, these medicines were recommended him during 9 years.
The health care provider Peter Grant acknowledged that certain patients were competing. So, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to studying scientific information about anabolic steroids. He claimed that he knew how steroids acted. Thus, he supervised the patients that took anabolic steroids.
Taking these aspects into account, it is possible to confirm that the physician Peter Grant was better known by those that administered steroids for performance-enhancing effects than by those that had to be cured from some diseases. Peter Grant affirmed that he knew that steroids were bought by his patients just for personal administration.
When the doctor appeared in the court, the judge confirmed that the physician promoted selling steroids. The judge confirmed that Peter Grant had to be punished appropriately. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for a year. Furthermore, the judge confirmed that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Musician Sheryl Crow couldn’t appear in court to be questioned about Lance Armstrong

The cyclist Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the sportsperson had used EPO and other banned products.
Many individuals provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation connected with Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the sportsperson was also targeted. She was scheduled to appear in the court. Several sports journalists noted that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by federal prosecutors.
The athlete Lance Armstrong and the musician Sheryl Crow were considered to be one of the most celebrated couples. They spent a lot of time together. The musician lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. The musician travelled with the athlete during his trainings. They were in a close relationship, when the cyclist won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton said that Lance Armstrong had used forbidden medicines. They also confirmed that the athlete had been the leader of a doping group. Furthermore, Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton declared that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment utilized for usage of prohibited preparations. These individuals were going to testify against Lance Armstrong. They claimed that Lance Armstrong had won Tour de France 7 times because of prohibited preparations.
When it comes to the musician Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the cyclist was dropped prior to the hearing.
While federal prosecutors dropped the case, the USADA continued to prosecute the former cyclist. As a result, Lance Armstrong lost his titles. He was also sentenced to life-time ban from professional sports. Fortunately, his charity against cancer was not destroyed. Sponsors continue to support him and donate. However his titles are stripped, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps many persons in their efforts against cancer.

Skip Bayless believes that Derek Jeter uses performance-enhancing drugs

The sports journalist Skip Bayless accuses Derek Jeter, a baseball star, of steroid use. He has pronounced his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
In fact, the sports journalist doesn’t have any basis in order to suggest that Derek Jeter uses forbidden medicines. Despites this fact, the affirmations of the journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of doping, Skip Bayless started to criticize anti-doping system of the MLB. He stated that the MLB’s tests for performance-enhancing drugs are not advanced enough to catch those who use prohibited medications.
The journalist Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s point of view connected with testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test that is utilized in the MLB. This method is not good enough to detect those that take banned medicines. Instead of this method, it is necessary to utilize another. Carbon isotope ratio is more suitable.
The ESPN2 journalist also noted that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this product is performed in the MLB only once per year. But blood tests for this product should be performed more times throughout year. Under other circumstances, players may take this product and remain undetectable.
So, Skip Bayless suggests that Derek Jeter takes HGH and prohibited medicines. The sports journalist also claims that if he were a baseball player, he would apply HGH.
Thus, the ESPN2 journalist supposes that MLB players use HGH and probably other prohibited medicines without being detected by the anti-doping system.
It is quite obvious that the steroid era in baseball is not over. Professional baseball players apply different banned drugs and avoid detection. But nobody can accuse a sportsperson of steroid use, basing only on improper drug testing. It is important to focus on facts, accusing an athlete of intake of forbidden medications. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

Melky Cabrera couldn’t avoid suspension

It happens frequently that when athletes test positive for any forbidden drugs, they try to prove that they have never used any forbidden product intentionally. They find different ways to manifest that they are innocent. They do a lot in order to escape from bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a situation.
The baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for testosterone. Undoubtedly, he was sentenced to a ban. Like other sportspeople he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and prevent the suspension.
A lot of doping athletes who are caught confirm that they have taken a dietary supplement which led to positive for certain prohibited substance. Although some athletes may have applied contaminated dietary supplements, numerous sportspersons use steroids and choose this method of defense because it works in many cases.
Thus, Melky Cabrera confirmed that he had taken a dietary supplement that led to his positive for testosterone. In fact, it was a hoax. Trying to prevent the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious product and advertisements which induced selling it. The supplement didn’t exist in reality. It was just a hoax of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the professional baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), was the person that created the site.
But the lie turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose the baseball player and Juan Nunez. Thus, the baseball player was enforced to serve the suspension.
The ACES got troubles as well. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were suspected of involving in the lie. But these persons affirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the web site and the lie which was invented by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had not been implicated in this lie.
The case is still investigated by the Food and Drug Administration. It is unclear yet whether other persons would be also prosecuted and sanctioned for the hoax.

Anabolic steroids are confused with corticosteroids

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection arrested 4 men who possessed the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam tried to smuggle these preparations to Bangladesh. The drugs were seized and these persons were detained.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a report about this situation, confirming that 4 men were arrested while they desired to traffic steroids that were intended for usage by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This piece of news surprised many people. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper inform about? Do prostitutes administer the same products like sportspeople and bodybuilder who try to improve their performance, enhancing muscle mass and stamina? Why do prostitutes apply anabolic steroids? Which is the purpose?
Some persons understood that it was wrong to suggest that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam tried to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Of course, prostitutes don’t use anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes use corticosteroids that differ from anabolic steroids entirely. Corticosteroids cause other effects. They have ability to improve performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids enhance muscle mass and reduce fat deposits, corticosteroids promote wasting muscles and enhance body fat deposits.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids applied by prostitutes. Those who use this medicine look healthier and more attractive. Thus, such prostitutes who administer this medication have more clients.
A prostitute who takes Orexadon confirms that she can serve up to 15 clients per day.
So, it is possible to assure that prostitutes don’t administer anabolic steroids which are commonly advised for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more proper drugs for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper published a false piece of news. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Clomid helps to get recovery steroid cycles

When you purchase steroids for cycles, you should also get such drugs that must be administered to get recovery after steroid use.
In case a steroid cycle lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG should be used during the cycle. It is important to take into account that this remedy is administered only during steroid use.
There such preparations that must be taken after steroid cycles. For example, Clomid should be used after steroid cycles. It is necessary to start applying this drug after androgen levels fall substantially and recovery with this medicine becomes possible. It is usually recommended to start administering Clomid with an enhanced measure (300 mg/day) and lower it gradually till 50 mg a day. Then low quantities are administered until steroid users are sure that natural production of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their usual size.
If Clomid is administered about 6 weeks and no improvement is observed, it is recommended to interrupt usage of this product. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is required to continue using Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is permitted to take this remedy a year. Several studies have displayed that long-term intake of this medicine doesn’t result in grave problems. However certain individuals may experience vision troubles because of Clomid, these troubles are not permanent. They disappear after discontinuation of application. If any problems related to vision system occur in those that take Clomid, they must stop taking this drug.
Clomid may be also taken after steroid cycles. A typical dosage is 75 mg/day in such situations.
However there are such medications which help to get recovery after steroid use and keep strength and muscle gains, it is not a good idea to apply long-term steroid cycles.

Which drug should you administer during PCT: Clomid vs Nolvadex?

Numerous individuals often ask which preparation is more proper for a PCT: Clomid vs Nolvadex. While several consumers of steroids think that Clomid is better for this need, others think that Nolvadex is more suitable. Some persons confirm that Clomid and Nolvadex should be combined.
When you evaluate structures of these products, you can see that they possess similar structures. That’s why they have some similar properties. But the most of persons and even specialists believe that Clomid and Nolvadex are entirely different products. Which basis does this affirmation have? These medicines are utilized in medicine for different purposes. Nolvadex is recommended for treatment of breast cancer in females. As for Clomid, it is taken in case of infertility. That’s why it is believed that these are wholly different medicines.
In fact, they may be also applied for various needs in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is advised in order to get recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. As for Nolvadex, it is normally used as an anti-estrogen drug.
Comparing potency of these medicines, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more powerful anti-estrogen substance than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex can decrease levels of estrogen, stimulating hypothalamus to produce greater amounts of testosterone.
When it comes to measures of these preparations, they are different because one of them is weaker than another. Clomid should be used in higher measures. So, such doses of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, produce more obvious benefits than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most powerful anti-estrogen. Such medicines, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are considered to be more powerful but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be administered together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such stacks are ordinarily applied in case of abnormal development of breast tissues.
When you want to choose which drug you should use: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take in consideration several aspects.
Nolvadex influences on cholesterol levels positively. It also has more direct influence on natural production of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already noted, Nolvadex is more potent than Clomid. In addition to these positive features, Nolvadex is safer. Moreover, Nolvadex causes less grave negative consequences than Clomid because more decreased doses are needed to cause good effects. Furthermore, while negative consequences of Clomid are permanent, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of administration. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to stoare more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, steroid users can make their choice appropriately.