Bruce Goldberger in case against Roger Clemens: theory of contamination can present

Testimonies of the prominent toxicologist Bruce Goldberger will probably impact significantly on decision of the court in the case against Roger Clemens. Bruce Goldberger is the Professor of Pathology and Director of Toxicology at the University of Florida College of Medicine. This expert didn’t testify on behalf of the government. Although he was invited in order to replace Don Catlin, the director of the WADA UCLA Medicine, Goldberger’s testimonies differed from those that are ordinarily provided by anti-doping agencies. He testified on behalf of the accused sportsperson.
Bruce Goldberger has gotten his celebrity due to his participation in various news programs. Even during such programs he doesn’t refrain from critical words. Bruce Goldberger criticized some anti-doping organizations, including the WADA.
Bruce Goldberger expressed criticism for feds in the case connected with Roger Clemens. They based on “beer can evidence” presented by Brian McNamee to support that his client took steroids and HGH. Brian McNamee, the former personal coach of this sportsman, presented a beer can containing used needles and syringes which had traces of such steroids, as Sustanon, Primobolan Depot and Deca Durabolin and were mixed allegedly with blood of Roger Clemens. The beer can was stored by McNamee more than 6 years. Bruce Goldberger noted that such basis wasn’t reasonable.
Goldberger claimed that it was impossible to base on “beer can evidence”. He explained that the accusation couldn’t be proven because the theory of contamination could present.
Thus, Goldberger didn’t support the evidence used by the feds. Earlier he also expressed criticism linked with evidence used by several anti-doping agencies.
Some years ago Goldberger testified on behalf of Floyd Landis, an American celebrated cyclist, when this athlete appealed positives for steroids. A WADA-accredited lab located in France discovered traces of exogenous testosterone; T: E ratio and carbon isotope ratio tests were applied by the lab. Goldberger expressed similar words and criticism during the appeal linked with Floyd Landis.
Bruce Goldberger claimed during an interview that the WADA utilized unsuitable methods and violated rights of sportspeople in order to reach the success in anti-doping programs.
Floyd Landis didn’t have success in his appeal and acknowledged that he had applied steroids, EPO and some other related medicines.
Nobody can be sure which results will be achieved by Roger Clemens. Will the federal prosecutors prove that he has lied before the Congress? Will he admit to using banned medications? Or will be the results opposite?